Google Sign-In Required

Use your company Google account to access the BetterFleet private content.

Back to private home

BetterFleet Support Private
Skip to content
BetterFleet Dev Wiki
0015 - Async/co-routine exception handling pattern
Initializing search
    bf-dev
    • Home
    • Process
    • Products
    • Reference
    • Decisions
    • Work
    • Operations
    bf-dev
    • Home
      • Process Handbook
      • BetterFleet Workflow Map
      • Product Development System
      • Product Engineering Workflow
        • Process Workflows
        • Work Intake and Weekly Planning
        • Product Engineering Workflow in Linear
        • Product Engineering Delivery
        • Agent Guidance
        • Workflow
        • Skills
        • Skill Sources
        • Process Guides
        • GitLab Feature Flags
        • In-App Docs Authoring
        • Release Notes
        • Process Templates
        • Release Plan: <title>
      • Process Publishing
      • Product overview
        • General Reference
          • Core Domain Training
          • System Topology
          • Two-Axis Ontology Model
          • Ontology Primer
          • Worked Example
          • Evidence, Ownership, and Lineage
          • Energy Management
          • Standards and Protocol Map
          • Charging, Roaming, and Commercial Model
          • Charge Planning and Operations
          • Cross-Cutting Domains
          • Domain Coverage Matrix
        • BetterFleet Product Ontology
        • Core Operations Data Ontology
        • BetterFleet R&D Plan
        • Index
        • Architecture
        • Manage Product Capabilities
        • Manage Data and State
        • Manage Service Interaction Flows
        • Manage Reference
        • Manage Internal Application Diagrams
          • Manage Authorization And Permissions
          • bf-manage-core Auth and Authorization Model
          • Manage Authorization and Permissions
          • bf-manage-web Auth and Permission Model
          • Manage Service Catalog
          • bf-depot-sim
          • bf-digital-twin (Manage Role)
          • bf-fleet-health
          • bf-manage-connect
          • bf-manage-core
          • bf-manage-incidents
          • bf-manage-roaming
          • bf-manage-sitepwrmon
          • bf-manage-web
          • bf-schedule-creator (Manage Role)
          • bf-support-microsite
          • bf-telematics
        • Index
        • Architecture
        • Plan Reference
        • Plan Internal Application Diagrams
        • Plan Migration and Flags
        • Plan Simulation Request Lifecycle
          • Plan Service Catalog
          • bf-bnl-schedule-analysis-compute
          • bf-bnl-settings
          • bf-bnl-ui
          • bf-digital-twin (Plan Role)
          • bf-route-modelling
          • bf-schedule-creator (Plan Role)
      • Where to Ask Product Questions
      • Reference
        • Platform Reference
        • Platform Architecture
        • Script Runtime Model
        • Compose Profiles and Modes
        • Repository Map
        • Monolithic Git Transition FAQ
        • Monolithic Git Sizing
        • CI and Release Integration
        • Shared Reference
        • Shared Infrastructure Architecture
        • Secrets and Env Strategy
        • Vendors and Local Dependencies
        • System Reference
        • Cloud Data Dependencies
        • Ports and URLs
        • Service Matrix
          • API Docs
          • OCPI API Docs
          • OCPP API Docs
          • OSCP API Docs
          • VDV API Docs
          • Yard State API Docs
        • System Design
        • System Design: BBA Microgrid Controller Generic Packet Translation
        • System Design: Depot Simulation
        • System Design: IoT Sensor Packet
        • System Design: Microgrid Energy Orchestration
          • System Design: OCPP Profile 3 And ISO 15118 PKI
          • Architecture: BetterFleet OCPP Profile 3 and ISO 15118 PKI
          • Specification: BetterFleet OCPP Profile 3 and ISO 15118 Certificate Lifecycle Management
          • System Design: On-Prem Control
          • Challenge
          • Specification: BetterFleet On-Prem Continuity Control
          • System Design: OSCP
          • OSCP Protocol Documentation
          • Depot Sim Testing Requirements
          • System Design: OSCP Flexibility Provider Domain
      • Decisions
        • Architecture Decision Records
        • 0001 - Record architecture decisions
        • 0002 - Cognito for Authentication and Authorisation
        • 0003 - AWS Amplify for Authentication
        • 0004 - DynamoDB for default database
        • 0005 - Data Persistence
        • 0006 - Trunk-Based Development
        • 0007 - Generalised principle for automation
        • 0008 - Naming Repositories, Services, and URLs
        • 0009 - Use Timezone Aware DateTimes and UTC
        • 0010 - Use semantic release
        • 0011 - Centralized feature flag repository
        • 0012 - Use Named Exports in Storybook
        • 0013 - RESTful TITLE GraphQL
        • 0014 - Service Granularity
        • 0015 - Async/co-routine exception handling pattern
          • Date
          • Status
          • Context
          • Decision
          • Consequences
        • 0016 - Logging & log levels
        • 0017 - Instantiated Models
        • 0018 - Repository Pattern for Database Access
        • 0019 - Use of Design Tokens in TypeScript React Application
        • 0020 - API backwards compatibility and versioning
        • 0021 - Alembic Migration strategy
        • 0022 - Consistent react-hook-form usage
        • 0023 - Domain Event-Driven Architecture
        • 0024 - Domain Event Bus Tech Stack
        • 0025 - No enum types in DB table columns
        • 0026 - In-Memory Ormar Stores for Repository testing
        • 0027 - Storing Tab State in Query and Local Storage
        • 0028 - Adopt OpenTelemetry Semantic Conventions for Structured Logging
        • 0029 - Adopt RFC 9457 for HTTP Error Responses
        • 0030 - Use GitLab registry and Terraform state for ECS services
        • 0031 - Adopt DDD, Hexagonal Architecture, and CQRS for Python Domain Services
      • Work
        • Active Work
          • Work: Bba Microgrid Controller
          • Implementation Specification: BBA Microgrid Controller
          • BBA Microgrid Controller Deliverables (Stories)
          • Work: BFDev Monolithic Git
          • Challenge
          • Specification: BFDev Monolithic Git v2
          • BFDev Monolithic Git v2 Stories
          • Work: Complex Circuit Load Balancing
          • Implementation Specification: Complex Circuit Load Balancing
          • Complex Circuit Load Balancing Deliverables (Stories)
            • COR-10 and COR-11 Consolidation Review
          • Work: Dispatch Reliability and Reconciliation
          • Challenge
          • Specification: Dispatch Reliability and Reconciliation
          • Dispatch Reliability and Reconciliation (Unit User Stories)
            • Dispatch populated vehicle cards grey surface snapshot
            • Dispatch Visual Review
          • Work: Enable Scheduled Managed Charger Access
          • Challenge: Enable Scheduled Managed Charger Access
          • Specification Exploration Dossier: Enable Scheduled Managed Charger Access
          • Specification Review: Enable Scheduled Managed Charger Access
          • Specification: Enable Scheduled Managed Charger Access
          • Work: Guided Cut-Off and Release Orchestration
          • Specification: Guided Cut-Off and Release Orchestration
          • Guided Cut-Off and Release Orchestration (Unit User Stories)
          • Work: Production Deployment Validation
          • Challenge
          • Work: Scheduled Report Parity
          • Specification: Scheduled Report Parity
          • Work: Telematics
          • Telematics EventBridge Path
          • Telematics Ingress Architecture
          • Specification: Telematics Migration into bf-manage-core with 5-Minute Freshness and Health Visibility
          • Telematics Core Migration MVP (Implementation-Time BDD)
          • Work: Vector Derms
          • Implementation Specification: Vector DERMS
          • Vector DERMS Deliverables (Stories)
          • Work: Visiting Vehicle Charging Visibility
          • Specification: Visiting Vehicle Charging Visibility
          • Visiting Vehicle Charging Visibility (Unit User Stories)
          • Work: Workspace Owned Stripe Roaming
          • Specification: Workspace-Owned Stripe Credentials for Roaming Payments
        • Backlog Work
          • Work: Microgrid
          • Microgrid Backlog Stories
          • Work: Mobile Ops Companion
          • Challenge
          • Specification: Mobile Operations Companion v1
          • Mobile Operations Companion Deliverables (Stories)
          • Work: Oscp
          • OSCP Backlog Stories
        • Archived Work
          • Work: Code Canonical Orchestration
          • Challenge
          • Specification: Product Engineering Workflow
          • Product Engineering Workflow Deliverables (Unit User Stories)
          • Work: Release Notes Automation
          • Release Plan: Release Notes Automation
          • Release Notes Automation Backlog Stories
      • Operations
      • Onboarding Runbook
        • Operations Runbooks
        • Production Hotfix Release
        • Staging Hotfix Release
        • Manage Staging Release Validation
        • Terraform Plan Dry Runs
        • Operations Tooling
        • Code Indexing
        • Operations Evidence
        • Database Restoration Test Report
      • Daily Operations Runbook
      • Testing Guide
      • Troubleshooting
    • Date
    • Status
    • Context
    • Decision
    • Consequences
    1. Home
    2. Decisions
    3. Adrs
    Platform Reliability & Safety Resilience & Security decisions general

    0015 - Async/co-routine exception handling pattern¶

    Date¶

    2024-01-10

    Status¶

    Proposed

    Context¶

    In our system architecture, we utilise long-running coroutines that are initialised at application startup. These coroutines are pivotal for continuous background processing and various asynchronous tasks. Effective error handling is crucial to ensure the resilience and reliability of these coroutines, especially since they run persistently and handle a range of operations.

    Decision¶

    We have decided to implement a two-tiered error handling strategy for our long-running coroutines: 1. Inner Loop Handling (Recoverable Errors): * Within the inner loop of each coroutine, we will focus on handling errors that are deemed recoverable. * This includes implementing retry logic or other recovery mechanisms for transient or expected errors, such as temporary network issues or service interruptions. * The coroutine should attempt to resolve these issues internally and continue its normal operation without escalating to a full restart or termination. 2. Outer Loop Handling (Critical Errors): * Outside the inner loop, we will implement an exception handler that catches any errors not addressed within the inner loop. * Upon encountering such an error, the coroutine will be terminated. This action is reserved for critical issues that indicate a fundamental problem which cannot be recovered from within the scope of the coroutine’s logic. * A critical log message will be generated upon such termination to alert system administrators and developers to the issue. 3. Use of Bare Except Clause: * We will employ a bare except clause to ensure all exceptions are caught, including those not explicitly anticipated. * While this approach can capture unexpected errors and we would not use it for short-lived code, in the context of long-running coroutines where continuous operation is desired, it provides a safety net. We recognise that this comes with the trade-off of potentially catching exceptions that might not need special handling, but in this scenario, the goal of uninterrupted service outweighs this concern.

    Consequences¶

    • Increased Resilience: The system will be more robust against recoverable errors, reducing the likelihood of coroutines failing due to transient issues.
    • Improved Error Visibility: Critical errors that cause coroutine termination will be clearly logged, making it easier to diagnose and address underlying issues.
    • Potential Overcatching: Using a bare except clause may lead to some exceptions being caught that could otherwise be handled differently, which could mask certain issues. However, this is considered an acceptable trade-off in this specific context of long-running coroutines.
    • Implementation Complexity: Developers will need to carefully distinguish between recoverable and critical errors and implement appropriate handling logic in both the inner and outer loops.
    Made with Material for MkDocs
    BFDev Docs Assistant
    New conversation?
    Ask one focused question at a time, this helps the assistant provide accurate answers about what's been implemented in BetterFleet.